Lifesupporters.com Forums
<-----Temporarily----->

Out of Order

...debugging potential font issues.
Go Back   Lifesupporters.com Forums > General Life Support Forums > The World around us > Politics
Politics State your Political Opinion. No flaming or arguing allowed, strictly moderated.

   
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-20-2004, 11:51 AM   #1 (permalink)
Merika
Retired
 
Merika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 1,000
Default Fetus -vs- Baby

In reading through the Peterson and other thread(s) regarding the baby incident..... I'm with Alkali in wondering why a baby is considered a 'fetus' for abortion rights, yet is considered a 'baby' in a crime and the person is prosecuted for taking a 'baby's' life?

I find it to be a contrast of interesting proportion.

I'm not at all trying to start an abortion debate.....I was just wondering on what basis does the public determine one from another.
Merika is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 12:02 PM   #2 (permalink)
Samson
Banned (Perm)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 842
Default

Thanks for trying to steer clear of the abortion issue, Merika :roll:


Commercialism: The word "baby" sells more air time and newsprint when associated with murder.
Samson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 12:09 PM   #3 (permalink)
Merika
Retired
 
Merika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 1,000
Default

Yeah....but Peterson got the death penalty for 'Baby Connor'. Granted, in both these cases the unborn child was well within the thrid trimester....but either it's a live baby person or it's not. Society can't pick and chose on a whim.
Merika is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 12:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
Fayebelle
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 787
Default

I'm trying to ask the good people at allexperts.com for you but the darn site is taking forever to load! Give me time and I'll have a law expert's answer for you- the rest of us would just be speculating on this one


Personally- I wonder if she had been under 3 months pregnant could he have used an abortion argument in his defense since he was a parent... OK that wouldn't work b/c he killed her too- but if a man killed only the baby- could he plead abortion? I'm sure he'd get some sort of assault charge on damage done to the mother but could he get out of a murder charge?
Fayebelle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 12:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
Merika
Retired
 
Merika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 1,000
Default

I was thinking perhaps the 'legal' aspect would be if the mother made the choice or it was made without her consent....that wouldn't clear up the difference in social perception though.

It WOULD be interesting to see how the legal verbage reads.
Merika is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 01:09 PM   #6 (permalink)
darkangelism
Veteran Member
 
darkangelism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 5,719
Default

i got kicked off allexperts as an expert because i went on vacation for too long


anyway, i think that the fact that it was baby conner here and would be a fetus if it was an abortion, is just liberal doublespeak, so they can have it both ways.
__________________
darkangelism is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 01:27 PM   #7 (permalink)
Stone
Veteran Member
 
Stone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,857
Default

Personally I think a BABy means it can live outside the mothers body and a fetus cannot
Stone is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 01:51 PM   #8 (permalink)
Fayebelle
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 787
Default

Yes- but even in late term abortion bills the child is referred to as a fetus and they would be as old as 'Baby Connor' Plus- many full term pregnancy babies could not survive outside the womb w/out the help of respirators, medication, etc...

No child could live unattended outside of the womb.
Fayebelle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 02:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
Merika
Retired
 
Merika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 1,000
Default

I just thought the double-speak of definition was sort of interesting and wondered if anyone else, besides Alkali who originally brought it up, noticed it.

I saw a 10 minute sonogram film clip of my grandchild which is 15 weeks old. It has little arms, legs and a mouth which was opening and closing. I'd have a hard time thinking of it as anything but a baby. If someone were to injure my daughter in law or this unborn baby....I certainly would consider it another life. I'm just surprised California did.
Merika is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 03:19 PM   #10 (permalink)
dogula
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkangelism
anyway, i think that the fact that it was baby conner here and would be a fetus if it was an abortion, is just liberal doublespeak, so they can have it both ways.
One of the arguments against abortion is that you are killing a living human, while but it apparently isn't wrong to do so when they are convicted of a crime. If you can convince me thats not doublespeak, I won't say you have a double standard.
dogula is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 04:11 PM   #11 (permalink)
darkangelism
Veteran Member
 
darkangelism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 5,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dogula
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkangelism
anyway, i think that the fact that it was baby conner here and would be a fetus if it was an abortion, is just liberal doublespeak, so they can have it both ways.
One of the arguments against abortion is that you are killing a living human, while but it apparently isn't wrong to do so when they are convicted of a crime. If you can convince me thats not doublespeak, I won't say you have a double standard.

if that was directed at me, ill say it is a double standard.
darkangelism is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 04:27 PM   #12 (permalink)
dogula
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 440
Default

Then why bother accusing liberals of doublespeak if you are guilty of the same?
dogula is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 04:33 PM   #13 (permalink)
darkangelism
Veteran Member
 
darkangelism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 5,719
Default

how so? i am anti abortion and anti murder so i say its wrong either way
__________________
darkangelism is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 04:46 PM   #14 (permalink)
dogula
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 440
Default

You are anti-abortion on the grounds that it is killing a human, but you are all for killing humans when it is execution for a crime.
dogula is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 06:19 PM   #15 (permalink)
darkangelism
Veteran Member
 
darkangelism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 5,719
Default

killing an innocent is different then killing someone who did something.
__________________
darkangelism is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 06:53 PM   #16 (permalink)
Duke
Founder
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The back of my mind.
Posts: 18,768
Send a message via AIM to Duke Send a message via MSN to Duke
Default

I think someone may have already mentioned it but I think the distinction comes from a fetus is something that's aborted by choice, a baby can be unborn but is treated as born as it would have happened if circumstances had allowed it to.
__________________


Help Support Us: Feel like Supporting Lifesupporters.com?


;$5/month $10/month $15/month

Fighting as Duke for the 332.

My Daughter Rules!

Thanks Lu for correcting my spelling
Duke is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 08:58 PM   #17 (permalink)
dogula
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkangelism
killing an innocent is different then killing someone who did something.
So you are for killing off people in one case but not another? Sounds like conservative doublespeak to me.
dogula is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote