| Marriage, Dating Discussing all issues surrounding marriage and dating. Is it love? Find out here. |
10-04-2004, 09:23 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Retired
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 13,268
|
Advantages of Marriage
I didn't want to thead jack Samson's post...so I was wondering....
I made the generic statement of both being single and being married has it's positives and negatives. OBVIOUSLY, this isn't a rocket scientist statement! LOL!
However, what exactly WOULD be the specific advantages of being married as far as anyone in here can see it?
There has to be some real good reasons or people wouldn't join online dating sites, go to clubs or go out of their way in any fashion to try finding the right person or their designated soul mate or whatever you want to call it.
What is the big expectation of fulfillment?

|
|
|
10-04-2004, 04:59 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Banned (Perm)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 842
|
I maintain that without the constant, incessant barage from society making marriage a cultural norm, it would die a quick death. The advantages of being married have diminished greatly over time.
One of the most serious modern "problems" that have arisen that makes marriage an antiquated institution is the dramatic increases in life expectancy during the past 100 years combined with the falling birthrate. essentially, with fewer children to raise, the externalities that might hold marriage together have proportionally diminished.
In addition, greater lifespans mean that when we are 40, we can look forward to ANOTHER 40 YEARS OF MARRIAGE compared to the comparatively few years our ancestors with 50 year life spans may endure at age 40. Moreover, these longer years are also healthier. Essentially we are living twice, but are stiil caught up in social norms based on our half-lives.
|
|
|
10-04-2004, 06:39 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Founder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The back of my mind.
Posts: 20,323
|
I disagree but I do so from an optimistic standpoint. I have not yet been married, close, but no cigar. I do want to get married but not because of social pressure or any other excuse. I want to get married so I can spend my life with the person I love. I'm a romantic at heart and still believe that marriage is a sacred institution.
There's bumps along the way but the bumps are there whether your married or single. It's nice to have someone close that can help you through the rough spots. However, an unsupportive partner only makes matters worse.
I suspect you will see positive responses from those of us who haven't been through the blender from a broken marriage, and negativity from those who have and are currently suffering marrital stress.
|
|
|
10-05-2004, 07:44 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Banned (Perm)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 842
|
Yes, I certainly agree that marriage is a concept most likely to be embrased by the "romanic." An entire multi $-billion industry has grow up to support this notion, and to contravert reality: 50%+ fail, and the 90% left are unhappily waiting until old age euthanises their relationships.
I don't think that when we wish upon a star, for someone to "help us through the rough spots" that we are anything but sincere. We all want this: However, the "sacred institution" rarely advertises, and certainly doesn't often mention just how many "bumps along the way" there are, nor is there the justifiably extreme emphasis upon just exactly how rough the "rough spots" will be over a period that is often expected to span over many decades. The mere recitation at the ceremony that the marriage will triumph "for better and for poorer" is almost flippant in the face of the realities.
And I do not advocate avoiding relationships out of fear that they may lead down the path of destruction. Certainly I hope everyone, including even Duke, can spend their lives with people that love them and return that love. But I am much more concerned about the underpublicized or purposefully ignored magnitude of their decision to commit their entire lives to what may very likely be more unimaginable hardship than they ever anticipated.
I know there are going to be those reading this post through their rose colored glasses, shaking their heads, thinking that love will conquer all, that more "hard work" will resolve the "bumps," and wondering what type of fire and brimstone filled marriage Samson must have. I'm just offering advise: Most have a long life to live, and like Arabess says, you only have one. We need to make VERY CAREFUL DECISIONS about with whom we may spend them. I'm advocating taking at least half the time you plan to spend with another and using it to make this decision; nott be months, or years, but perhaps decades.
|
|
|
10-05-2004, 02:24 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Retired
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 13,268
|
For anyone reading......Arabess = Merika  It comes with the territory of changing screen names.....
There is a concept that the person you marry will catch you when you fall. There are those within a marriage which know that very person who was supposed to catch you... ended up being the VERY person who pushed your butt off the cliff.
THAT is a very lonely feeling.
I think eventually, once the bitterness goes away, love once again becomes an emotion worth seeking and honing.
|
|
|
10-06-2004, 11:22 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Founder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The back of my mind.
Posts: 20,323
|
I've given your reply a lot of thought Samson and I just don't see it that way. I really don't believe it's because I wear rose-colored glasses either. I have been very close to marriage to a woman who mothered my child. I have never, and hope to never again, feel that kind of pain. The relationship was passionless and cold; I see that now because I can look at it objectively. It happened once; it can happen again, does it mean that if I give it another try that I'm a fool?
I'm on board with your statistic about 50% of marriages failing; in fact I think the number is higher now. As for the 90% unhappiness, I've been unable to find one article that supports that statistic. I also have trouble with the whole concept that our own mortality has a lot to do with divorce. You are not talking about an increase in life expectancy of 10 years or more; the statistics are likely to reflect an average increase of a few months to a year per gender. I've found 2 sources that basically state the following: "According to a report from the Centers for disease Control and Prevention, life expectancy rose to 77.2 years in 2001, up from 77 years in 2000. While life expectancies for men and women both rose, men's life expectancy, at 74.4 years was still significantly shorter than the 79.8 years women can expect to live." The closest resource I could find to add validity to the age claim was found here.
The above clutter aside, the average divorce age is between the ages of 25 - 39 according to this reference. If the divorce rate is so high at these younger ages then I have difficulty understanding how mortality enters into it.
Now on to what I do agree with. I believe marriage is a multi-billion dollar industry and anyone with a hand has it buried in the young couples pockets. A good friend of mine is getting married this Sunday and his head is spinning from the costs. Paying people to attend your wedding is ludicrous and if I were to have a "traditional marriage", I would pass the expenses on to the people who want to see it happen. Not enough of them, then me and chicky hop in the family truxter, drive on down to Las Vegas and get married at a drive through with Elvis Presly presiding. Then we blow the rest of our dough on stuff we want to do. If we're in debt, it's because we spent all the money on crap we wanted to do and the memories are ours for eternity, exactly the way it should be.
As far as bumps are concerned. Everyone has them and you either navigate them together or they break you apart, it's that simple. Being single doesn't mean the roads less bumpy, especially if you're a single parent. It's just nice to have someone to share it with when the time comes. That's all I meant in my previous post.
My last comment goes to giving marriage a lot of thought. Clearly I have and feel secure enough with myself to know whether or not it's the right decision. I did my homework, both mentally and physically. I've been through the gutter as well when it came to relationships but refuse to let them get me down. I know a lot of people, I know a lot of good people, and I know a lot of happy people. Some of them are married, some are separated or divorced, others are single.
In closing, I feel that there is hope for marriage. I don't feel the institution of marriage has been embarrassed by anyone except the fools who enter into it unwisely and divorce inside of a few years. I'm either an optimist or a fool, but I don't wish to be roasted or embarrassed for it. As you may have noticed, I'm a little passionate about my response. I tried to remove any type of emotion I may have had in this post but I believe I failed miserably. I also hope I didn't offend you Samson with my reply; I guess I just see it a bit differently. I'm really glad you're here to help keep some balance and add thought provoking content to the site. I've been working on my response for the last day and a half and I thank you for challenging me the way you have. I guess my response is more of a personal justification of my belief structure. Either that or emotional twaddle, you be the judge.
|
|
|
10-07-2004, 04:40 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Retired
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 13,268
|
The portion of bitterness one feels from divorce is largely based on the number of years you were in it, the investment you made and the losses going out. Yes...those losses can be in living in a different house from your child for the first time....all the way to traumatic financial losses.
I have a friend who is out of this situation now since the children are adults. However, he got a divorce, not to his choosing, as a young man with four children. He lost his home, his vehicle and related assets. He then paid such a huge amount of child support, insurance, extra child related expenses....until he barely had enough money to live on.
In addition, he neither had the room (since he rented in a hovel) or the finances to keep his kids on the prescribed weekends or summer weeks.
He was/is still very bitter about his divorce.
In contrast....I've raised two children BY MYSELF with no child support. I have bitterness issues as well.
Neither of these situations have anything to do with lost love. Lost love happens. However, when your life gets totally torn a part and your kids suffer.....as a parent and adult....bitterness comes with the territory.
Just another angle.
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 03:04 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Founder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The back of my mind.
Posts: 20,323
|
I agree with you Merika but I don't think time is as big of a factor in post marriage troulbes. In fact, it's quite possible that the healing has already begun by the time the split is legal. I think most of the trauma comes from splitting the loot.
|
|
|
10-10-2004, 10:45 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Retired
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 13,268
|
Yeah...that's very traumatic.... especially for a man. I think men base much of their identity on what they've gathered and accomplished financially. Splitting it up is very difficult.
I think the HARDEST part of the whole divorce though is just getting to the point of one person finally telling the other person "I'm leaving...it's over." It's hard to hear.....but I think it's harder to say.
|
|
|
10-10-2004, 02:12 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Founder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The back of my mind.
Posts: 20,323
|
I'll tell you something about men, we need nurturing just as much as our female counterparts. As men, we tend to ignore that need as it's not socially acceptable or not "manly" to show in the open. Behind closed doors though, it's different for most of us males. We need to be cuddled and loved just as much as any woman does. We just seem to want it more on our own terms for some reason. Our gender is not as emotionally plugged in as the female gender and it's a bit sad.
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 01:34 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Retired
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 13,268
|
I think both males and females have distinctive roles. Sometime they overlap....sometimes they don't. I'm a firm believer in being who you HAVE To be for your family and laying the stigma's aside.
As a single Mom....I'll whine with you over your homework....I'll also whip someones A$$ if they come within your safety territory.
I'm not masculine....and men aren't feminine for being more sensitive. Again....we all be who we need to be to make our family work.
Personally, I think that's what makes mankind special! They evolve and grow into who and what they have to be.....based on circumstances.
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 10:50 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Founder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The back of my mind.
Posts: 20,323
|
Agreed but many don't understand it that way which is at the core of divorce IMO. Things are much different at the beginning of the courtship than after things "settle down". Pre-conceived ideas are shattered and so is the spirit within the marriage. Divorce is only a matter of time once this happens IMO.
|
|
|
12-25-2004, 10:48 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Banned (Perm)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 842
|
Quote:
|
As for the 90% unhappiness, I've been unable to find one article that supports that statistic.
|
Interestingly, I'm recalling something Dr. Phil states in "Relationship Rescue."
One of the best sources I've found of information for those considering divorce is "The Good Divorce;"
http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0060...63#reader-page
One of the interesting notes was that females emphasise the emotional elements of the mariages breakup and need to focus more on the material divisions, while men do the opposite, needing to focus more on the emotional to facilitate a more amicable divorce.
| |