You are prolly right Merika, i just didn't want to say it that way i guess. I said humans i think, but that's not what i meant.
:roll: Did i say something else? I may have been confused as to whether that was what the bible said exactly or not, that part is rather difficult to understand without guidence and no one's ever explaned it to me fully yet, and i didn't want to say something that might have been incorrect. I wonder if they may have come down in some type of craft, or how they actually got here? It would explain the whole alien scenerio, and other scriptures i can think of in Ezekiel as well.
I know some people believe Noah was about 8 feet tall. I know that the environment, oxygen, atomic rays penetrating the o-zone, and several other factors may have had something to do with humans being very large and living for hundreds of years as well as growing to extreme sizes, but i don't think Noah would have been that size and lived as long as he did due to genetics. I tend to believe the environment may have had more to do with it and still affects human growth, how long we live and the diseases we see today. If we ever find the Ark, or at least identify the real one, we'll know for sure how tall he was. We can prolly figure out how long his arm was from the cubit conversion, if it's larger than the average human size he would have prolly been very large, if the size of a cubit taken from the measurement of the boat is average then we would be able to determine his actual size. I would think that like today to build a boat that size he would have had to have had an accurate, exacting way to measure things like wood etc...
I know the bible said they had sex with human women ...that would prolly explain the genetic traits we see in 8 foot basketball players today
There is this guy, Ron Wyatt, he followed the exodus story out the bible exactly as it was written and he found thousands of Egyptian chariots, horse bones, oxen bones and human bones at the bottom of the Red Sea. The point of the crossing was a alluval fan which deposited so much sediment that the bottom of the ocean in that particular spot is only about three hundred feet deep. On either side of this land bridge the ocean is well over 1000 feet deep. The Saudi government has been trying to hide this area from the general public by fencing it off and placing a government building there. However, the reseachers found the Egyptian side of the ocean where King Soloman placed a pillar to commemorate the crossing. There was also a pillar placed on the Saudi side, but i think Wyatt he said the writting on the Saudi side was destroyed by someone, but i think he said the Egyptian one still has the writting on it. I personally think this is the greatest archeological find in history, maybe some day he'll get his due credit for it. Too bad Wyatts dead now.
http://www.arkdiscovery.com/red_sea_crossing.htm
http://www.wyattmuseum.com/red-sea-crossing.htm
Wyatt also thinks he discovered where Noahs ark landed after the flood. However, i have heard that there could be several sites found that could also be the site of the landing, so i guess it's gonna take a while to figure out where the real site is, but i personally believe this is the actual ark site. I have no idea why or even how someone could have or would have carved crosses on rocks before Christ was born, it dosen't make any sence unless you were Noah. So maybe he really did discover the actual resting place of Noah's ark.
He also followed the scriptures to what is believed to be the real Mt Sinai, where Moses recieved the ten commandments from God. What i find really amazing about the Mt Sinai site is that the top of the mountain has been turned into Metamorphic rock!! It is impossible to form metamorphic rock above ground, it can't happen!!!! As a Geologist i know it takes thousands of degrees to melt a rock. This is what metamorphic rocks are, melted rocks. They are always found at the bottom of any gologic column, friction and pressure are what produce the heat to melt them. It is physically impossible to melt rocks above ground, and these rocks are only melted a few feet on either side of the mountain, the heat would have to be greater than a nuclear weapon!! You can't simply just start a fire and melt rocks, not any rocks. Looking at the pictures, the rocks which were melted are sandstones ....sandstones are only produced in aqueous or eolian environments (desert, water).
The only way these rocks could have melted would have been under a massive amount of sediment producing great heat, MILES of sediment, Or to have been volcanic in nature ...or produced in laboratory somewhere. In which case the rock would have exibited what we call regional metomorphism and granitic dikes, this is where extremely hot, usually magmatic rocks, would have made contact with the sourrounding rocks but only for a few inches to maybe a couple of feet from the magmatic intrusion. However, neither of these explanations are adiquate enough to explain what is going on in this case, and i see nothing to suggest otherwise. It's as though the top of the mountain was set on fire, JUST AS THE BIBLE SAID!!! 8O I mean, what this Wyatt guy found was a textbook description of a biblical event, what are the odds the bible could be this accurate about everything on earth? It's litterally impossible. Unless the bible is true and accurate.