it's a theory and will remain that. I've yet to see one shred of concrete evidence to help convience me. You can tell me about what people think and how they believe we evolved or what they think happened but that makes evolution no different then any other religion. You still have to have faith in it because it isn't testable, observable, and demonstrable, which therefore means it's not even science.
To add another point, yes I do believe in micro-evolution, like the stories we've heard about sheep that lived in certain regions over a few generations grew longer legs to adapt to the terrain. But we've yet to see (and never will) a factual "missing link" which isn't the skeleton of some guy who had artheritis or a skeleton that was built up based on the tooth of an extinct pig. It's just ridiculous.
If you want to argue against creation then you need to understand it and the scientists who teach it. I grew up in the public school system, every science class I had shoved evolution down my throat so I had no choice but to learn it but I've also learned the alternative too. If you want to argue the point and know what you're against then I suggest you read up a little on the actual SCIENCE of creationism. Not because you'll have to debate me on the subject either, I'm not much good at that, but so you'll know just what it is your so adamently arguing against.
Here's a good CREATIONIST link if you're interested in checking it out:
http://www.drdino.com:8080/QandA/index.jsp